| Pages: 1 2 [3] 4 5 6 7 8 |
41. Chart is confusing, please correct the chart. - in EVE General Discussion [original thread]
Tom Gerard wrote: T3s should be the ultimate in subcapital DPS and Tank. Period. they use advanced sleeper AI interlocking mechanisms with melted capacitors and LORE. I'm a fan of lore and backstory as much as the next guy, and doubly so f...
- by Sanadras Riahn - at 2013.06.10 10:13:00
|
42. Playing EVE through Steam - in EVE General Discussion [original thread]
I'd amend your screenshot and blur out the numbers, just for safety. Otherwise, thanks for the tip! I hadn't considered transferring a character to a new Steam account, since I had previously purchased EVE through Steam anyway. Wonder if I could b...
- by Sanadras Riahn - at 2013.06.10 09:04:00
|
43. L4 Battleships for Low-Med SP - in Ships and Modules [original thread]
Rain6635 wrote: lI've been meaning to try a neutron blaster naga with logi support. Talos will put out a bit more damage thanks to the tracking bonus, plus a flight of Drones. Plus, it looks like a damn sports cruiser.
- by Sanadras Riahn - at 2013.06.10 09:02:00
|
44. This fit from 2007 still good for blaster brutix? - in Ships and Modules [original thread]
Nevrok Nisaean wrote: Thanks for reply. How much at a disadvantage will I be if I use this set-up vs. a set up with rails? I used rails for a bit just to test it out, and I felt like I had way more fun using close range weapons. If the differ...
- by Sanadras Riahn - at 2013.06.10 07:24:00
|
45. Chart is confusing, please correct the chart. - in EVE General Discussion [original thread]
Amarra Mandalin wrote: That sounds pretty good actually at first blush. I haven't had time to consider the cons/sacrifices but thanks for taking the time to input some apparently well thought out suggestions...even if you are a miner. (kidding)...
- by Sanadras Riahn - at 2013.06.10 06:36:00
|
46. Chart is confusing, please correct the chart. - in EVE General Discussion [original thread]
CCP Ytterbium wrote: Tech3s are due for a change, and are not meant to go above Tech2 in terms of raw performance (example: Warfare Subsystems, have a look why at the end of this blog ) . The other problem with Tech3s is that only a few of th...
- by Sanadras Riahn - at 2013.06.10 06:11:00
|
47. Chart is confusing, please correct the chart. - in EVE General Discussion [original thread]
Amarra Mandalin wrote: Yes, but as far I can see you didn't suggest anything and just summarized (mostly debatable) points that have been made. If you have suggestions for making the T3 "interesting" and "fun" in its pending re-balance, I, for ...
- by Sanadras Riahn - at 2013.06.10 05:21:00
|
48. Chart is confusing, please correct the chart. - in EVE General Discussion [original thread]
Alavaria Fera wrote: Being a great miner has bonuses when considering the capabilities of a T3 cruiser. Not a miner. Regardless, I brought up those particular points to help explain why I wasn't pointing to specifics as to why the T3 is OP...
- by Sanadras Riahn - at 2013.06.10 04:10:00
|
49. Chart is confusing, please correct the chart. - in EVE General Discussion [original thread]
Alavaria Fera wrote: Great credentials. Because ship-to-ship PvP is the single solitary facet to EVE Online, right?
- by Sanadras Riahn - at 2013.06.10 03:39:00
|
50. Chart is confusing, please correct the chart. - in EVE General Discussion [original thread]
Mr Kidd wrote: [Actually, my favorite ship is my Mega, followed by my Dominix and my triple rep Myrm. My Proteus is the realization of certain realities of w-space life. Wait, you're going to completely ignore that non-T3's can beat T3's and ...
- by Sanadras Riahn - at 2013.06.10 03:22:00
|
51. Chart is confusing, please correct the chart. - in EVE General Discussion [original thread]
Copper Rei wrote: Surely there are more creative solutions than just admin override 'click' and banned from h-sec sites. And I'd be willing to bet that as soon as the T3 balance changes actually go into effect, that banned-from-high-sec-site...
- by Sanadras Riahn - at 2013.06.10 02:02:00
|
52. Hi Resolution Texture Pack - Show Your Support!!! - in EVE General Discussion [original thread]
Can't remember if I already voted for this. Regardless, I cannot express how badly I want a High-Res EVE Online! +1 from me!
- by Sanadras Riahn - at 2013.06.09 13:18:00
|
53. Chart is confusing, please correct the chart. - in EVE General Discussion [original thread]
ElQuirko wrote: baltec1 wrote: ElQuirko wrote: While I agree it would be lovely to see the properly protean T3s, it seems futile to lessen the power of the T3 ships without giving them some sort of in-space purpose-changing function. N...
- by Sanadras Riahn - at 2013.06.09 13:01:00
|
54. Chart is confusing, please correct the chart. - in EVE General Discussion [original thread]
ElQuirko wrote: Riot Girl wrote: Why does it matter? If you can fly a T3, you can fly a HAC. Eerm no, check the requirements next time you log in? The Proteus requires neither Weapon Upgrades V nor Energy Grid Upgrades V, for example. A...
- by Sanadras Riahn - at 2013.06.09 10:41:00
|
55. Odyssey L4 Battleships (Low-Med SP) - in Missions & Complexes [original thread]
Chainsaw Plankton wrote: where do you run missions? Imo that is probably the biggest difference. what does the best dps vs the Rats you fight most often? 1) Ease of use I can't really see a big difference in the ships you listed. Maelstrom is ...
- by Sanadras Riahn - at 2013.06.09 03:42:00
|
56. New Armageddon for pve - in Ships and Modules [original thread]
Ginger Barbarella wrote: Cpt Arareb wrote: get 1000 dps or more between tank and firepower, if you are capstable, your doing it wrong, goodluck What??? That didn't even make any sense... Not certain where you're confused. "Make sure ...
- by Sanadras Riahn - at 2013.06.09 00:22:00
|
57. L4 Battleships for Low-Med SP - in Ships and Modules [original thread]
Tsukino Stareine wrote: Ireland VonVicious wrote: Tsukino Stareine wrote: Ziaja wrote: Tsukino Stareine wrote: 670 DPS is extraordinarily low for a battleship, my myrmidon can put out 600 DPS to 52km........ I think you'll find tha...
- by Sanadras Riahn - at 2013.06.08 22:36:00
|
58. L4 Battleships for Low-Med SP - in Ships and Modules [original thread]
Ziaja wrote: Offtopic, but it can be useful - Is it better to get shield boost amplifier over Invul field? The fit I posted is missing it due to the hull skill increasing boost amount by itself, but I'm obviously inexperienced with this.
- by Sanadras Riahn - at 2013.06.08 20:04:00
|
59. Odyssey L4 Battleships (Low-Med SP) - in Missions & Complexes [original thread]
Gimme more Cynos wrote: Question: Missiles are no option? CM's on a Raven are huge since the patch, and fit nice to most of your points.. Missiles were something that was being considered, but are currently on hold due to where my SPs have b...
- by Sanadras Riahn - at 2013.06.08 19:53:00
|
60. I Miss Simplicity - in Intergalactic Summit [original thread]
Andreus Ixiris wrote: Diana Kim wrote: He said he misses simplicity, not simpletons. Well I imagine that's why he doesn't pine for your company. "I'm rubber, you're glue..."
- by Sanadras Riahn - at 2013.06.08 12:39:00
|
| Pages: 1 2 [3] 4 5 6 7 8 |
| First page | Previous page | Next page | Last page |